Case studies · Verified on Clutch
Two real engagements, written up from the clients’ own words.
Each case study below is built only from what the client published in a verified review on Clutch — the problem they described, the work they said was done, and the result they reported. No client names, and no figure that isn’t in their review. Where the record says nothing, the page says less.
TechBrot publishes two case studies, one for each verified Clutch engagement. A first-year QuickBooks cleanup for a food & beverage business, and a credit-card reconciliation cleanup for a business-services company. Both follow the same order — problem, scope, corrections, outcome, CPA-readiness — and every statement in them comes from the client’s own review, which you can read at the source.
Source: the two verified client reviews on Clutch, read September 26, 2026. Clients are not named; the reviews themselves are public on Clutch.
The case studies, in five questions.
How many case studies does TechBrot publish?
Two — one for each verified Clutch engagement: a first-year QuickBooks cleanup and a credit-card reconciliation cleanup.
Where do the facts in these case studies come from?
Only from the clients’ own verified reviews on Clutch, read on September 26, 2026. Nothing is added that the review does not say.
Why aren’t the clients named?
The case studies are anonymized by design. The reviews are public on Clutch, and each case study links to them.
Do the case studies show what the work cost?
No. Fees are not shown. Current fee ranges for this kind of work are on the cleanup pricing page.
What order are the case studies written in?
Problem, scope, corrections, outcome, and CPA-readiness — the same order for both, so they can be compared.
Read the case studies.
Two engagements, both verified on Clutch, both anonymized. Each links to the client’s review at the source.
First-year QuickBooks cleanup
A first-year owner’s QuickBooks records had accumulated errors. The records were reviewed and corrected, transactions reconciled, miscategorized entries fixed and the chart of accounts organized — ready for tax preparation.
Read the case study Business services · Mar–Apr 2026Credit-card reconciliation cleanup
A year of credit-card records carried duplicate transactions and wrong categories. The 2025 reconciliation was cleaned up, duplicates identified, transfers corrected, and balances aligned with bank statements.
Read the case studyThe rules behind every case study.
- Only the record. Every statement comes from the client’s verified review on Clutch. Quotation marks mean the client’s exact words.
- Anonymized. No client or company names. The industry and the client’s role are shown as Clutch shows them.
- No invented numbers. No figure appears that the client did not state. No fee is shown.
- Less where the record is silent. If the review does not cover a section, the section says so rather than filling it.
- Checkable. Each case study links to the review at the source, so you can compare it with what we wrote.
More about how we work, including the primary-source rule, is on how we work. The reviews themselves are on verified client reviews.
Questions about these case studies.
Are these composite or illustrative stories?
Can I read the original reviews?
Why only two case studies?
Do the case studies include numbers?
Is my situation like these?
Does TechBrot file taxes for the clients in these case studies?
Your file next
The useful case study is your own books.
Start with the free QuickBooks file review: plain-English findings and an optional written fixed-fee scope within 3 business days. No obligation.